Drawing for TRUCKING HALL OF FAME

USPTO serial 76156234

TRUCKING HALL OF FAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUCKING HALL OF FAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D Harty

JEFFREY D HARTY MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, PLC801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-8009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Transportation accessories, namely, chrome truck accessories, stainless steel truck accessories, exhaust, lights and lens, tool boxes, air deflectors, wooden consoles, wheel simulators, neon, mirrors, drivers' accessories, floor mats, air filters, nut covers, bezels, cabguards, bumpers, center panels, light brackets, and bumper guidesACTIVE
025Clothing, namely hats, shorts, sweatshirts and T-shirtsACTIVE
041Museum with transportation and semi trucks as its themeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 9, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 9, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 28, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 21, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance