USPTO serial 76156670
FASHION DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2002
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FASHION DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING WEARING APPAREL AND COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WEARING APPAREL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |