USPTO serial 76157133
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley C. Macel, III
STANLEY C MACEL III CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized database management, namely, management of interactive computer-based global information systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations, for gathering, processing analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats, and platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer network design for others, namely, designing interactive computer-based global information management systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations, for gathering, processing analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats, and platforms; installation of computer software program, namely, installation of interactive computer-based global information management systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations for gathering, processing, analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats and platforms | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |