Drawing for KM

USPTO serial 76157133

KM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIZEAR, LISA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley C. Macel, III

STANLEY C MACEL III CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computerized database management, namely, management of interactive computer-based global information systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations, for gathering, processing analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats, and platformsACTIVE
042computer network design for others, namely, designing interactive computer-based global information management systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations, for gathering, processing analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats, and platforms; installation of computer software program, namely, installation of interactive computer-based global information management systems for use by industrial, commercial, technical and/or scientific companies, entities or organizations for gathering, processing, analyzing, structuring, archiving, benchmarking, organizing and distributing of information and data derived from and accessible to multiple internal users, sources, locations, formats and platformsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 12, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 11, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance