Drawing for MR. DVD PLUS DESIGN

USPTO serial 76157184

MR. DVD PLUS DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MR. DVD PLUS DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MannyD. Pokotilow, Esq.

MANNYD. POKOTILOW ESQ12TH FL SEVEN PENN1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2217

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040MANUFACTURE OF DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 22, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Mar 11, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 1, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance