USPTO serial 76157290
KATALYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3086951Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KATALYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28013 Madrid, ES
28013 Madrid, ES
28013 Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
PERLA M. KUHN Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPF.D.R. StationP.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING AND RENTAL OF SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; ENGINEERING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |