USPTO serial 76157313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
35270 Combourg, FR
35270 Combourg, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicolas E. Seckel
NICOLAS E SECKEL WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN LLPSTE 7001250 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; load shedding circuits, thermostats, software for home automation for use by energy users to track and control energy consumption and energy costs, modems; apparatuses for controlling and monitoring energy, designed for individual or industrial buildings, namely, thermostats, load shedding circuits, circuit breakers, current rectifiers, regulating switches | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Thermostatic valves for heating and ventilating installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data and messages by computer terminals; communication services via computer networks, namely, electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and encryption; electronic communication, namely, electronic mail services, delivery of messages via electronic transmission, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, and remote control services through electronic communications for home automation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |