Drawing for DELTA DORE

USPTO serial 76157313

DELTA DORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELTA DORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicolas E. Seckel

NICOLAS E SECKEL WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN LLPSTE 7001250 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; load shedding circuits, thermostats, software for home automation for use by energy users to track and control energy consumption and energy costs, modems; apparatuses for controlling and monitoring energy, designed for individual or industrial buildings, namely, thermostats, load shedding circuits, circuit breakers, current rectifiers, regulating switchesACTIVE
011Thermostatic valves for heating and ventilating installationsACTIVE
038Electronic transmission of data and messages by computer terminals; communication services via computer networks, namely, electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and encryption; electronic communication, namely, electronic mail services, delivery of messages via electronic transmission, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, and remote control services through electronic communications for home automationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 23, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance