USPTO serial 76157339
SUTFEN APPAREL SUT(FEN)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUTFEN APPAREL SUT(FEN)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darrel Capers
108-53 SUTFEN BLVDJAMAICA, NY 11435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | TOPS, BOTTOMS, UNDERWEAR, FOOTWEAR, HEADWEAR, DRESSES, SCARVES AND GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |