USPTO serial 76157628
RXDISPENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RXDISPENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rochester Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Nemazi
JOHN E NEMAZI BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR FL 20-2SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT FOR DISPENSING PILLS TO CONSUMERS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PHARMACEUTICAL PILL DISPENSER AND ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES THEREFOR, PILL DISPENSING CASSETTES AND AUTOMATED COUNTERS, AUTOMATED RETRIEVAL DEVICES ALL FOR OPERATING SUCH DISPENSERS AND FOR COLLECTING AND ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTING PATIENT VITAL SIGN AND PILL CONSUMPTION DATA; ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR FILLING PILL TRAYS AT A PHARMACY | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | DISPENSERS FOR PILLS SOLD EMPTY | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF ELECTRONIC ADVERTISEMENTS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE TARGETED TO PATIENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HEALTH CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, DISPENSING OF PILLS TO CONSUMERS AT THE TIME OF CONSUMPTION AND COLLECTION OF PILL CONSUMPTION DATA AND VITAL SIGN DATA FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION TO A REMOTE MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |