Drawing for VQ ASIA

USPTO serial 76157816

VQ ASIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VQ ASIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD A. PENNINGTON

EDWARD A PENNINGTON SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP3000 K ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line journals in the fields of business, commerce, and financeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 20, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance