USPTO serial 76158167
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R Basile
ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | communication networks, namely computer hardware for managing and implementing communications by and between components of a telecommunications network, namely radio data transmission; computer hardware equipment for data transmission comprised of modem, radio based stations, mobile stations, repeater stations, rely stations, user stations, and control equipment namely, wireless switching and routing apparatus, frequency hopping systems, cellular infrastructure and data networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation of computer networks and systems, namely, communication networks for radio data transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation and research in the field of creating and operating communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |