USPTO serial 76158194
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Codigo 45070, MX
Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Codigo 45070, MX
Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Codigo 45070, MX
Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Mescal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 5, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |