USPTO serial 76158258
LASER UT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASER UT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ HUGHES & LUCE1717 MAIN ST STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201-4685UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Instrumentation for use in the field of aircraft testing, namely, interferometers with photorefractive detection capability, and systems comprised of pulsed lasers to generate ultrasound in the part being tested, probe lasers to illuminate the surface for detection, a laser ultrasonic receiver to detect surface displacement, a workpiece automation unit, signal processing software and date presentation software, all for laser-based ultrasound non-destructive testing for the purpose of quality control and inspection of materials and structures during their use or manufacture; analytical equipment comprising lasers, interferometers, optical filters, and computer software for generating, detecting, measuring, and evaluating ultrasonics with lasers within a material under test; computer software for interpreting, evaluating, and visualizing ultrasonic data in the field of aircraft testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |