USPTO serial 76158265
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redditch Worcestershire B98 7SY, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M Weinberg
2390 E CAMELBACK RD STE 250PHOENIX, AZ 85016-3469UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely machines for the manufacture and processing of paper, cardboard and corrugated cardboard; machines for creasing, scoring, bending, punching, cutting, printing and gluing of paper, cardboard and corrugated cardboard into boxes, cartons and containers; machines for use in the packaging industry; machines for stamping and hot and cold embossing; machine coupling; machine belting; control devices for machines and machine tools in the paper and cardboard industry; parts for machines and machine tools in the paper and cardboard industry; fittings for machines and machine tools in the paper and cardboard industry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |