USPTO serial 76158274
EDIBLE ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDIBLE ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J Moore
LARRY MILLER FEDER, KASZOVITZ, ISAACSON, WEBER, SKALA750 LEXINGTON AVE 23RD FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | FELT AND FIBERTIP PENS, NAMELY, PENS CONTAINING EDIBLE COLORANTS; COLORING BOOKS; CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY BOOKS; KITS COMPRISED OF THESE ITEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by P&M PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by P&M PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by JPI COLORWORKSHOP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named EDIBLE ART
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |