USPTO serial 76159708
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Scott Johnson
E SCOTT JOHNSON OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER120 E BALTIMORE STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-1643UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, firmware and software (depending upon the platform it will reside) embedded in wireless phones/pagers/PDAs or other wireless devices, which incorporates mobile location technology to facilitate the location of mobile wireless devices or other wireless devices using the Global Positioning System (GPS), as well as the transmission of this location data or mobile device specific data across the voice channel of the wireless network; microprocessors; integrated circuits; microcomputers; computer chip sets; wireless telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely wireless phones, radio pagers, PDAs fiber optic and metallic line testers, asset tracking devices, and telematics units for use in motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |