USPTO serial 76160059
HARRISON HILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARRISON HILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
S. SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE D. STIMMEL, ESQ.
LEE D STIMMEL ESQ STIMMEL, STIMMEL, & SMITH155 MONTGOMERY ST12TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-3902Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Swiss-army style knives; kits comprising a combination knife and fork with a survival card; hand operated wrenches; hand operated pliers; hand tool sets, namely sets containing sockets and screw drivers; ten-in-one fishing tools, namely, a fishing tool consisting of a knife, weight scale, flat screw driver, phillips head screw driver, bottle opener, hook remover, pliers, tape measure, fish scaler, and fish line cutter; combination manicure sets and clothes brushes sold as a unit; manicure sets; snow shovels; combination automobile window washers and ice scrapers; and nose hair trimmers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coin dishes; shoe shine kits comprising polish, applicators, brushes, and towels; and hair brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lavin Company
- Other trademarks owned by Lavin Company
- Other trademarks owned by J. JACOBS & CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named HARRISON HILL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |