USPTO serial 76160437
ITWIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITWIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Sun
RAYMOND SUN ATTORNEY AT LAW12420 WOODHALL WAYTUSTIN, CA 92782UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY GOLF CLUBS, TENNIS RACKETS, RACQUETBALL RACKETS, SQUASH RACKETS, BADMINTON RACKETS, BASEBALL BATS, AND SPORT BALLS; PLAY TENTS; SPORT GAME AND PLAY STRUCTURES, NAMELY COLLAPSIBLE STRUCTURES THAT HAVE ONE OR MORE SPORTING OR AMUSEMENT ITEMS ASSOCIATED THEREWITH; PLAY SHELTERS; DOLL HOUSES; FLYING DISCS; FLYING KITES; SPORT GOALS, NAMELY BASKETBALL GOALS, SOCCER AND HOCKEY GOAL NETS; PLAY CONTAINERS; ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS AND MACHINES; AND ELECTRONIC LEARNING AIDS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL MACHINES FOR CHILDREN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |