USPTO serial 76162295
M-WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M-WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather C Wilde
AMY L NEKIN DARBY & DARBYPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, magazines in the fields of high technology and mobile business | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | arranging and conducting trade show conferences and expositions in the fields of high technology and mobile business, and online information services, namely providing information in the field of mobile business via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | online information services, namely, providing information about the high technology industry via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CMP Media Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CMP MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CMP MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M-WORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |