USPTO serial 76163386
B2A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAN HORN, TAWANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B2A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Salai
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH AND LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and user manuals distributed therewith for remote control, management and monitoring of information appliances, entertainment devices, office equipment, home appliances and industry specific equipment, motorized construction equipment, medical equipment, automotive vehicles namely, personal digital assistants (PDA's), mobile phones, set-top boxes, web phones, web terminals, digital cameras, compact disc players, stereo tuners, receivers and amplifiers, television sets, video arcade games, photocopiers, computer printers, fax machines, scanners, refrigerators, clothes washing and drying machines, dishwashers, stoves, microwave ovens, fire alarms, burglar alarms for the home, vending machines, equipment for heating, ventilation and air conditioning, furnaces, air conditioners, air chillers, heat pumps, utility meters, all by way of global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of computer software systems that utilize information appliances, namely, defining, building and managing computer software systems for others that utilize appliances including information appliances such as personal digital assistants (PDA's), mobile phones, personal communicators, set-top boxes, web phones, web terminals, an digital cameras; entertainment devices such as music players, stereo system televisions, interactive game and video arcade games; office equipment such as copiers, printers, fax machines, and scanners; home appliances such as refrigerators, washers, dryers, dishwashers, stoves, microwave ovens and alarm systems; and industry specific equipment such as vending machines, HVAC equipment, namely furnaces, air conditioners, air chillers, heat pumps and utility meters, connected to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |