USPTO serial 76163670
CELLTECH MEDEVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLTECH MEDEVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Heban
LINDA HEBAN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | indicated above in commerce for "pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary compounds and substances; prescription and over the counter or consumer health pharmaceuticals; preparations for killing weeds and destroying vermin, including the aforesaid consisting of peptides and being products of monoclonal antibody or deoxyribonucleic acid technology; cultures; gene therapy | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | surgical, medical and dental apparatus, instruments and devices; parts and fitting for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research and development services; consultancy services; all relating to the biological, medical and chemical sciences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |