USPTO serial 76164766
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FL-9490 Vaduz, LI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B Murray
ROBERT B MURRAY ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVESTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS FOR HAND, BODY AND FACE, COLOGNES, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE AND PAMPERING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN MOISTURIZER FOR BODY AND BEAUTY CARE; HAIR TONICS; TEETH CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY TOOTH PASTE | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, READING GLASSES, PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS, MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; BLANK ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CHINA DISHES, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; PORCELAIN DISHES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |