Drawing for SPRING CREEK RANCH

USPTO serial 76165536

SPRING CREEK RANCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRING CREEK RANCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy C. Prager

LEONARD C DUNAVANT JR STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA1000 RIDGEWAY LOOP RD STE 200MEMPHIS, TN 38120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012motorized golf cartsACTIVE
018golf umbrellas, tote bagsACTIVE
024golf towelsACTIVE
025Clothes mainly; golf shirts, golf jackets, golf hats, golf pantsACTIVE
028divot repair tools, ball markers, golf bag covers, golf balls, golf accessory pouches, golf bags, head covers for golf clubs, golf tee markers, golf bag tags, and golf flagsACTIVE
041golf club services, fitting of golf clubs to individual users, golf caddie services, golf courses, and golf tournamentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 1, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance