USPTO serial 76165536
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy C. Prager
LEONARD C DUNAVANT JR STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA1000 RIDGEWAY LOOP RD STE 200MEMPHIS, TN 38120UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motorized golf carts | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | golf umbrellas, tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | golf towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothes mainly; golf shirts, golf jackets, golf hats, golf pants | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | divot repair tools, ball markers, golf bag covers, golf balls, golf accessory pouches, golf bags, head covers for golf clubs, golf tee markers, golf bag tags, and golf flags | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | golf club services, fitting of golf clubs to individual users, golf caddie services, golf courses, and golf tournaments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |