USPTO serial 76166329
CLEARBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEARBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Yusong-ku, Taejon 305-438, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J Canning
KEVIN J CANNING LAHIVE & COCKFIELD28 STATE ST FL 24BOSTON, MA 02109-1784UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Adhesive plaster for medical purposes; antibiotic agents; antiphlogistic agents; bandages for wound dressing; adhesive bandages for medical purposes; preparation for the treatment of burns; corn remedies; fungicides for medical purposes; general purpose germicides; medical herbs; pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of disease and disorder of the skin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |