USPTO serial 76170104
SPLIT-RING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPLIT-RING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Nichols Matthews
Julie Nichols Matthews Locke Lord LLPP.O. Box 1470Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-1470Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |