USPTO serial 76170105
SPLIT RING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2861875Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPLIT RING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Nichols Matthews
Julie Nichols Matthews Locke Lord LLPP.O. Box 1470Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-1470Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stein Narvestad A.S
- Other trademarks owned by Stein Narvestad A.S
- Other trademarks owned by Stein Narvestad A.S
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SPLIT RING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |