Drawing for CREATOLOGY

USPTO serial 76171528

CREATOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2854225Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2004
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CREATOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam K. Sacharoff

Adam K. Sacharoff Much Shelist, PC191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1800Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Multimedia production and editing services, namely, audio, videotape, and motion picture film editing and production servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2001
042Graphic art and multimedia design services for others, computer generated graphic art design and graphic illustration services for others, and computer services, namely, designing and implementing web pages for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Jun 15, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 30, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 15, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 15, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 28, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 9, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 2, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 2, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 20, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Nov 10, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 6, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 18, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 29, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jan 8, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance