USPTO serial 76172452
CITY CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IVEY, IAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITY CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton HM DX, BM
Hamilton HM DX, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A Pennington
EDWARD A PENNINGTON SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLP3000 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing data, voice, and video communications bandwidth for use by other telecommunications companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |