USPTO serial 76180054
VISIONSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLASS, JEREMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISIONSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. W. Johnston
R W JOHNSTON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SHAPED CD FOR INTERACTIVE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2000 |
| 035 | PREPARATION AND DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; WEB SITE DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE SEARCHABLE DATABASE FOR THE ORDERING OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; DEVELOPING ANIMATION, CHARACTERS AND VIRTUAL TOURS FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPING LOGOS AND BRANDING FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2000 |
| 042 | HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DEVELOPING AND CONDUCTING COMPUTER BASED TRAINING | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |