Drawing for ROADRUNNER

USPTO serial 76181676

ROADRUNNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRUNO, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROADRUNNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES K. LEWIS

JAMES K LEWIS PATTON BOGGS LLP867 COAL CRK CIR STE 200LOUISVILLE, CO 80027-0015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for dispensing a variety of foam agents, namely, a compressed air foam dispensing unit for use in fire suppression, fire insulation and for neutralizing chemical and biological agentsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 7, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 7, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Oct 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 25, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance