USPTO serial 76185498
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jorge Arciniega
Jorge Arciniega Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and telecommunication channels | ACTIVE | Dec 26, 2000 |
| 038 | radio broadcasting services | ACTIVE | Dec 26, 2000 |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of on-going audio programs provided by telecommunication channels, featuring music, news, talk shows, listener call-ins, traffic reports, and events, namely, grand openings, remote broadcasts, sports, charities, festivals, and listener contests | ACTIVE | Dec 26, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |