Drawing for RAPPORE

USPTO serial 76186690

RAPPORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RAPPORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen A. McGee

ALLAN THOMPSON SENFORCE TECHNOLOGY INC266 W CTR STOREM, UT 84057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enabling wireless communications between computers and wireless devicesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 18, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 18, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 18, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance