Drawing for PRACTICE MANAGEMENT PEARLS

USPTO serial 76186809

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT PEARLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRACTICE MANAGEMENT PEARLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H Flax

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201-2725UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines relating to business, marketing, financial and general practice management for physicians and medical personnel via a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 15, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 7, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 20, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 2, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 27, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 16, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 14, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance