USPTO serial 76193986
SKYPARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYPARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Anderson
BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC SATELLITE TRACKING AND INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPRISING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED TO DETERMINE DISTANCES ON GOLF COURSES AND FOR ACCESSING RELEVANT DATA AND STATISTICS PERTINENT THERETO | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |