USPTO serial 76194005
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1752 VILLARS-SUR-GLANE, CH
VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
Villars-sur-Glane 2, CH-1752, CH
Other trademarks owned by VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
Villars-sur-Glane 2, CH-1752, CH
Other trademarks owned by VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
Villars-sur-Glane 2, CH-1752, CH
Other trademarks owned by VAN CLEEF & ARPELS LOGISTICS S. A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Gottlieb
GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; eau de parfum, toilet water, cologne, cologne spray, after shave lotion and after-shave balm, deodorant for personal use, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving foam, non-medicated skin balm, body lotion, body powder, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, toilet soap, solid soap, bath and shower gel, essential oils for persona! use, preparations for tanning the skin, make-up products, namely foundations and concealers, lipstick and nail polish | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Precious stones; goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, necklaces, jewelry, chains, ear clips, stud earrings, rings being jewelry, pendants, ankle bracelets, watches, watch bracelets, clocks, cufflinks, body piercing studs, button covers, hair ornaments, headbands, decorative boxes, belt buckles, precious metal money clips, key and key chains, cigarette lighters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |