USPTO serial 76194581
BIG M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe D. Stevens
JOE D STEVENS BRYAN, NELSON, RANDOLPH ET AL6524 U S HWY 98 WHATTIESBURG, MS 39402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship in the field of food products | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 1970 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |