USPTO serial 76195046
BITFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BITFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ONTARIO K1J 9B9, CA
ONTARIO K1J 9B9, CA
Ottawa, Ontario KlJ 9B9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVDSTE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Graphics software for the world wide web, Internet, Intranet, and similar network environments; Graphics software for use on a global network of interconnected computers and computer networks; Cross-platform graphical rendition engine for software, firmware and hardware applications; Computer hardware; Computer software for use in modifying, converting and re-formatting information, data, text and images and for accessing, viewing, transferring and storing information, data, text and images over computer networks, telecommunications networks and data communications and networks of all types | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for others for the world wide web, Internet, Intranet, and similar network environments; Design and development of computer software for others for a global network of interconnected computers and computer networks; Design and development of computer software for others for use in modifying, converting and re-formatting information, data, text and images and for accessing, viewing, transferring and storing information, data, text and images over computer networks, telecommunications networks and data communications and networks of all types; Offering customer and technical assistance by telephone, electronic mail and in-person in the field of graphics software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BITFLASH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BITFLASH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bitflash Graphics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BITFLASH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |