Drawing for CELLTECH PHARMA

USPTO serial 76199247

CELLTECH PHARMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CELLTECH PHARMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Heban

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and gene therapy products, namely, allergy medications, analgesics, anti-inflammatories, antibacterial pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, anticoagulants, antidepressants, antihistamines, bronchodialators, cardiovascular pharmaceuticals, clinical medical reagents, decongestant tablets, expectorants, hemoglobin, hormones, hydrocortisone, medicated lozenges, migraine treatment preparations, muscle relaxants, nasal spray preparations, nausea treatment preparations, pain relief medication, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations for use in chemotherapy, vaccinesACTIVE
010Inhalers for therapeutic useACTIVE
042research and development services; consultancy services; all relating to the biological, medical and chemical sciencesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 28, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance