Drawing for FRESH WATER

USPTO serial 76201607

FRESH WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025casual apparel, namely, T-shirts, shorts, polo shirts, swimwear sold only in Applicant's sporting goods storesACTIVEMar 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 29, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 20, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 20, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 11, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 6, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 10, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 13, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 7, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance