USPTO serial 76203342
GET BENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GET BENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 4Z7, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS DESIGNED FOR THE INTERNET, NAMELY, TO ENABLE BUSINESSES TO ENGAGE IN RETAIL AND BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TRAINING PROGRAMS, AND ASSISTING CORPORATIONS WITH INTERNET RELATED FEATURES, NAMELY, ONLINE ORDERING VIA SECURE E-MAIL, SHOPPING MALL SETUPS AND BUSINESS TO BUSINESS SITE HOSTING TO SECURE ON-LINE CREDIT CARD PROCESSING | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | INTEGRATION AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING CUSTOM E-COMMERCE SITES TO FACILITATE EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION FOR CORPORATIONS; AND PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AND NETWORK PROBLEMS VIA AN INTERACTIVE ON-LINE HELP DESK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |