USPTO serial 76204362
MOBILEID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILEID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD J. MILSTEIN
HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, a computer server platform for enabling and facilitating provision of wireless communications and computing services; computer software development tools featuring application program interface (APIs) and software development kits (SDKs) for creating smart applications and intelligent agents for wireless communications devices and wireless computer hardware; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of instruction guides in the field of wireless communications software and application development; electronic publications, namely, instruction guides in the field of wireless communications software and application development recorded on computer disk, CD-ROMs, and other magnetic and optical disks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Publications, namely, instruction guides in the field of wireless communications software development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom software design and development for others; computer services, namely, providing on-line instruction guides and technical documents in the field of wireless communications software and application development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MobileID, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MobileID, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MOBILEID
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |