Drawing for NUVENTIVE

USPTO serial 76205797

NUVENTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2886911Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 21, 2004
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NUVENTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID V RADACK

DAVID V RADACK Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPITTSBURGH, PA 15219United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, computer software for managing the outcome assessment process for academic institutions and computer software for collecting, storing and organizing personal interaction and access to such personal information subject to the control of the owner of such personal informationACTIVEJan 16, 2001
035[ Business consulting services ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED
042[ Computer consultation services ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2024NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED
May 14, 2024RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 14, 20249G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8
May 14, 20248PRTREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED
May 14, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 29, 2024E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 5, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 17, 201489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Feb 17, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 15, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 3, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 16, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Jul 14, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 25, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 23, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
May 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 2, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance