USPTO serial 76208559
REAL FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REAL FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Visalia, CA, US
Visalia, CA, US
AFP ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTS LLC
NEW HOLLAND, PA, US
AFP ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTS LLC
NEW HOLLAND, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Altoff
Kristin H. Altoff Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Dairy or soy based beverage mixes, whipped dairy based dessert toppings, yogurt dessert mixes, and dairy based dips ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 2005 |
| 030 | [ Relish, salsa, gravies and sauces, dessert mixes for making baked desserts, ] dairy based desserts excluding yogurt | ACTIVE | Nov 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Real Fresh, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Real Fresh, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AFP ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AFP ADVANCED FOOD PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named REAL FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |