USPTO serial 76209515
CONNOLLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONNOLLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ashford, Kent, TN2H 0SA, GB
Ashford, Kent, TN2H 0SA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D FISHMAN
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAND AND BODY SOAPS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; PERFUME AND FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, EAU DE TOILET, COLOGNE, AFTER SHAVE, SATCHET AND SCENTED HAND AND BODY LOTIONS AND SOAPS; COSMETICS; HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES; PERSONAL DEODORANTS, LEATHER BLEACHING PREPARATIONS; CREAMS FOR LEATHER; LEATHER PRESERVATIVES; AND WAXES FOR LEATHER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |