USPTO serial 76211771
CAMPAIGN CALCULATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAMPAIGN CALCULATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal (Quebec), CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PLANNING ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS, INCLUDING, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING DATA RELATING TO BUDGETARY, DEMOGRAPHIC, GEOGRAPHIC, TEMPORAL AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS AND EVALUATING OPTIMAL METHODS OF TARGETING DESIRED CONSUMERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |