Drawing for LIQUID BANDWIDTH

USPTO serial 76212392

LIQUID BANDWIDTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIQUID BANDWIDTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing communications connections and transfer of data, voice, video and other information via a fiber optic-based networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 4, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 19, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance