USPTO serial 76212407
CROSSFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROSSFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santiago 35, CL
Santiago 35, CL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Knedeisen
MARK KNEDEISEN KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING COMMERCE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2005 |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR FACILITATING COMMERCE OVER THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |