USPTO serial 76212665
ZERO TOUCH - TOTAL KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZERO TOUCH - TOTAL KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ascot SL5 7PW Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn M. Sandberg, Esq
CAROLYN M SANDBERG ESQ SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG WOESSNER & KLUTH PAP O BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely, routers; computer software for configuring or controlling telecommunications equipment, namely, routers, and for configuring or controlling computers for accessing online information services and the global computer network; compact disks containing computer programs for configuring or controlling telecommunications equipment, namely, routers, and for configuring or controlling computers for accessing online information services and the global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |