Drawing for MCARD

USPTO serial 76212745

MCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F Krieger

MICHAEL F KRIEGER LEKIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR 60 E S TEMPSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036electronic commerce, namely, electronic, wireless and point of sale processing and transmission of bill payment data via a global computer network, electronic cash transactions via public and private networks including a global computer networkABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 30, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 30, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 30, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance