USPTO serial 76212823
SHELLEY VON STRUNCKEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHELLEY VON STRUNCKEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SWIP-1QE, GB
London SWIP-1QE, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |