USPTO serial 76213721
INFOMINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3114520Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INFOMINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly B. Markley
Molly B. Markley YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 W. Big Beaver RoadSuite 624TROY, MI 48084-3107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Reminder services in the area of upcoming important dates and events; personal scheduling services provided via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |